Ethics don't exist. However, the non existent human society relies on imaginative principles of an ethical ideal, trying to perform what best suits this imaginary world. If ethics don't exit, there is nothing that defines what good and bad is, meaning that there is no principle by which humans must behave. Ethics is just a word that appears to have a logical definition. Bearing in mind that ethics are non existent, and at the same time putting it side, do you believe it is logical to have a set of principles by whichbehavior must be raised? This principles were made in the imaginary and non-existent world by a group of humans just like you. This accounts for the reason that nothing is real. How do you know what is good or bad? But the explanation gets deeper. Humans don't exist. All there is, is one being trying to perform a mental society, obeying mental rules, living in a world inside his own brain. This is because nothing exists. Everything is conceived by yourself which do not have a life. So do you believe that while being non existent and not having an ethical code, it is possible to categorize stealing and lying not only as not ethical but also as existent? The answer to these set of questions rely on rhetoric. It is of your own will to decide whether or not to believe my words or not. To me, stealing and lying are nothing more than non existent words.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
It can be considered ethical if you are getting what you want. You have to put your goals infront of you because life is meaningless, and your goals give you purpose.
ReplyDelete